22 Feb 13
These excellent comments from a friend and academician:
âLanguage serves us, not only by providing an ability to clearly and efficiently communicate, one person to another. It also provides us with an ecumenical âvocabulary of concepts.â For us to integrate bits of raw information and, from that, form concepts and principles, our agreed-upon vocabulary must be accurate and precise.
Marketers, politicians, and other shallow propagandists are experts at undermining the precision of our vocabulary, strictly for their own short-term gain, as you noted. For example, âjournalistsâ at Fox News apparently donât know the difference between the terms âkillâ and âmurder,â as they carelessly use them interchangeably when reporting details of crime stories.
At a more guttural level, other media journalists promiscuously banter about âthirty-round bullet-clipsâ and âmachine-gunsâ (when actually referring to semi-automatic rifles). They talk about âbulletsâ when they mean âcartridges.â Police officers donât just âshootâ violent criminals. They apparently have to âblastâ them. The mediaâs willful, arrogant ignorance is not just an example of naive incompetence. It is all agenda-driven. They not only âdonât know what they donât know.â They donât want to know!
The way we communicate reflects the way we think. Our ability to communicate honestly, clearly, efficiently, and precisely drives the advancement of this civilization and our progress as individuals. Our wonderful English Language provides a powerful instrument, but weâre rejecting it. And, as a country and culture, we are predictably falling on our collective faces!â
Comment:
âVarious modes of worship which prevailed in the Roman World were all considered by the people to be equally true, by philosophers to be equally false, and by politicians to be equally useful.â
Edward Gibbon
/John