28 May 15
âFriendsâ Like These:
Iâve been, and continue to be, involved as an expert assistant in a number of product-liability lawsuits, many involving Glock pistols.
During the course of such litigation, Iâve been treated (so long as my gag-reflex holds out) to sham arguments by sleazy plaintiffâs attorneys. They typically say,
âIf only Glock pistols had manual safety levers, if only Glock trigger strokes were longer, my client would not have been injured… ad nauseamâ
Never a word, of course, about the pistol being carelessly pointed in unsafe directions, nor fingers being in contact with triggers at inappropriate times, nor other blatant safety violations.
We may expect this kind of nescient rubbish from the mouths of the willfully ignorant, anti-gun crowd. When it come from the mouth of one who purports to be a Second-Amendment supporter, it makes me openly question whose side he is really on!
In an editorial appearing in the 19 May 15 issue of the LA Times, Mr Bob Owens, describes Glock pistols as âa danger to us all!â Mr Owens is editor of a blog, bearingarms.com, which is generally pro-gun.
Citing several antidotal shooting accidents, Owens decries Glockâs lack of a manual safety and âshortâ trigger-stroke, saying,
âThe underlying problem with these (Glock) pistols is a short trigger-pull and the lack of an external safetyâ
âThough short trigger-pull guns dominate the law-enforcement market, they arenât the only game in town. A number of major and minor agencies use guns with much longer double-action triggers that are just as easy to fire deliberately but are much harder to fire accidentally.â
Of course, he fails to name any of these non-Glock-using agencies!
In addition, he fails to name a single pistol that would live up to his âstandardsâ
In the end, he simply says,
âLetâs arm our police with firearms that go off only when the officers mean to fire themâ
Again, he never gets specific. We curiously never get to know exactly what gun(s) heâs talking about!
I suspect Mr Owens doesnât even carry a gun!
I notice in his blog, he has subsequently admitted,
âSadly, the truly incompetent bottom-performers will still have issues, regardless of the platform used.â
Okay! There is apparently no pistol those people should have!
This is yet another example of the weary, âYouâre too stupid to own a gunâ contention.
The entire industry devoted to the manufacture of serious pistols is currently making guns that work, from the user standpoint, just like Glocks, like the SIG P320, H&K P9, Walther PPQ, FNC, S&W M&P, Kahr, SA/XD, Beretta APX! Right now, when you want to sell serious duty pistols they need to be (1) polymer-framed, (2) striker-fired, (3) with no manual safety lever or button, and (4) no manual decocking lever. Nearly all have âshortâ triggers, at least by Mr Owenâs standards. Some do have manual safeties, or offer them as an option, but the vast majority donât!
Most all old, DA/SA pistols, which he apparently likes, are now long-since out of production. The few still in production sit on the poorly-lighted, bottom rung of store shelves, gathering dust!
Who say police should be banned from using modern arms make me angry! When Glocks, and all the other pistols named above, are âtoo dangerousâ for police, well, they must be too dangerous for anyone!
And, weâre right back in the courtroom, and the newspaper editorial office, learning that weâre apparently all too stupid to own any kind of gun!
Once again, with âfriends like these,â we donât need enemies!
/John